Wikipedia Page Creation Service

About us

We specialize exclusively in Wikipedia.

At Lustre PR, we research, write, publish and maintain policy-compliant pages for notable individuals and organizations. Our work is built on transparency, accuracy and strict adherence to Wikipedia's editorial standards, so your achievements are represented with the credibility they deserve.

We're so confident in our results, you only pay when the page is live.

Learn more about Lustre PR

01

Wikipedia Page Creation

From notability assessment to a live article with a Knowledge Panel. We handle every step.

Explore → 02

Ethical Wikipedia Editing

Fully disclosed, policy-compliant updates, corrections and maintenance for existing pages.

Explore →

The importance of Wikipedia

A Wikipedia page works harder than any other asset you own.

One of the most visited websites in the world, and one of the few people still trust. A well-crafted page is the authoritative narrative that appears whenever anyone searches for you.

◆

Instant credibility

Wikipedia signals independent recognition. It's the credential people see before they meet you.

▣

Google Knowledge Panel

Wikipedia is the primary source for the information box that appears when people search for you.

◎

AI search visibility

Siri, Google Assistant and ChatGPT pull from Wikipedia. Your page becomes part of the answer.

▤

Permanent record

Unlike press releases or social media, a Wikipedia article is a verifiable, lasting reference.

▲

Higher search rankings

Wikipedia pages appear on the first page of Google results, a result no ad budget can replicate.

◈

Partner trust

When partners research you, Wikipedia frames the narrative before any conversation begins.

Why it's harder than it looks

Deserving a page and getting one approved are two very different things.

Wikipedia rejects a significant number of new articles, not because the subject isn't noteworthy, but because the submission doesn't follow the rules.

Wikipedia is maintained by a global community of volunteer editors who apply strict, well-documented policies to every submission. They've seen every variation of the self-promotional article, the thinly sourced biography and the corporate puff piece, and they reject them without hesitation.

Our team has handled over 260 Wikipedia projects. We know how the volunteer editors think, what they flag and what they approve. We write articles built for editorial scrutiny from the first sentence: sourced, neutral, structured and compliant.

SubmissionEditor's verdict

~~"An award-winning visionary who has transformed the industry."~~WP:PROMO

~~Sourced to the subject's own website and a press release.~~WP:RS

~~Submitted from an undisclosed second account.~~WP:PAID

~~Three paragraphs, no independent coverage in depth.~~WP:GNG

Neutral biography, every claim cited to independent reliable sources, disclosed editor, notability shown under the guideline that applies to the field.Accepted

The Lustre process

Every step, from notability assessment to vandalism protection.

Nine steps in three phases, handled through one disclosed account.

Before

01
Notability assessment
We check you against the guideline that applies to your discipline, free, within 24 hours.
02
Source research and compilation
Independent, reliable coverage gathered and verified before a word is written.
03
Article drafting and peer review
Neutral, encyclopedic prose reviewed internally against Wikipedia policy. You check the draft for factual accuracy.

Publishing

04
Submission by a trusted editor
Submitted through our single disclosed account, HRShami, with a proven track record.
05
WikiData entry creation
Structured data that feeds search engines and assistants.
06
Google Knowledge Panel optimization
Your information box, sourced from your new page.

After

07
Post-publication monitoring
We watch the article after it goes live.
08
Ongoing article maintenance
Updates, improved sourcing and corrections as your record grows.
09
Vandalism protection
Bad edits reverted; your presence protected permanently.

~10 daysto your first draft, which you check for factual accuracy

10 to 14 daystypical Wikipedia editorial review after submission

2 to 8 weeksfrom start to publication, depending on complexity

What sets us apart

Built around doing it the right way.

Wikipedia has strict rules about paid editing and most agencies don't follow them. Our entire practice is built on transparency, strict adherence to Wikipedia's policies and genuine respect for the encyclopedia's community.

Pay after publication.

You don't pay until your Wikipedia page is live. No upfront fees, no risk, just results. If your page doesn't go live, you pay nothing.

$0 upfront

We check eligibility first

You won't pay for work that leads nowhere. Notability assessment happens before the project begins, and we say no when the answer is no.

Neutral, policy-compliant writing

We don't write promotional copy. We write encyclopedia entries that pass editorial review.

One trusted editor account

In line with Wikipedia's paid-editing policy, we use a single disclosed account, HRShami. Its history and disclosures are public. We operate in the open.

Post-publication support

We monitor and maintain your article long after it goes live, protecting your presence permanently.

Full transparency

You'll know what we're doing, why, and what to expect at every stage. No hidden fees, no surprises.

Three years of maintenance

Monitoring, updates and vandalism reverts for three years after publication, included in the fee.

Find out if you qualify

A free, written notability assessment within 24 hours.

Give us your name, your field and any coverage you already know about. We research your independent sources, assess you against the Wikipedia guidelines that actually apply to your discipline, and send you a one-page verdict.

1A clear verdict on where you stand: notable, borderline, or not yet
2Each Wikipedia criterion you meet, listed and marked individually
3Written in your own language if you prefer
4Delivered as a PDF within 24 hours

Not everyone who asks us qualifies, and we say so. When the answer is no, we explain what would need to change and leave it there. No charge, no follow-up pressure. We only take on subjects we believe will pass review.